Castles were designed to hold people, weapons, and supplies to survive a siege. They were well-defended. Taking one could easily be a long, bloody struggle. Why attack at all?

Most castles I've seen could be trivially circumnavigated. The resident soldiers would have to come out to attack, bringing the conflict into the open and away from traps. Why didn't armies simply ignore castles and go around? Are there any examples of this approach succeeding or failing? Was the belief that castles are worthwhile based more on experience or imagination?

Armies go around castles all the time, but what usually happens is that the castle is placed under. This is done at least with the intention of keeping the defenders in, and hopefully taking the castle via attrition, bombardment, sapping or treachery. The need to siege the castle is important; if you ignore the castle and march on, this leaves the rear of your army - and worse, your supply line - highly vulnerable to attack by the defenders sallying forth. There are few examples of this happening because ignoring castles without besieging them is a huge tactical blunder. So why have castles if the attacker can just siege them? Because sieges are very expensive to do.

Apr 26, 2010. Debate rages whether the Maginot Line would have stopped the Germans even if it had been complete, but considering how much warfare had changed since the trench warfare of World War One, it probably would only have slowed them down. Once the Germans breached it at any point, most likely the. Live through the intense action of World War II! This 1944 warfare game lets you play as the heroic American troops. Storm the beach battlefield with your army, and take total control! Dominate battles to upgrade troops and win the entire war! Warfare 1944 is one of our selected War Games.

Manning a perimeter is obviously going to take more manpower than manning an isolated strongpoint - the Art of War quotes a tenfold requirement in men, which although not a hard rule, gives you some idea of the scope of the problem. Also it is very likely that this siege is being done in enemy territory, giving the defenders an advantage. Also, castles tend to be well-stocked with supplies, so that even without resupply, they can often last months, sometimes even years. Take a look at this; there are many examples of ones lasting more than one year. With the defenders able to maintain such a huge logistical advantage for a very long time, how can you not see how awesome castles are?

This is also why castles are sometimes assaulted, despite the huge tactical disadvantage: the attackers simply cannot afford to tie up so much of their forces in a siege, or continue supplying them through enemy territory for so long. Ignoring the defenders risks the rest of the army coming under attack at their weakest positions. Hannibal's invasion of Italy during the shows some of these dynamics at play: • Despite invading from the north, Hannibal bypassed Rome to • He did not really besiege Rome (but being one of the best generals in history, ). Download crows zero 3 sub indo mp4 hd.